Early on in Bitcoin's life, Satoshi had a clear plan for increasing blocksize as necessary, but you went and screwed that up with your buddies. Hope it was worth it for you per$onally. OGs will never forget.
In any case, what Satoshi remarks were you referring to? Perhaps his last related to the subject?
> Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't scale. [...] Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the chain so it's easy for lots of users and small devices
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28917#msg289...
I stopped working on some Bitcoin seven years ago after being burned out by harassment, threats, and an a literal trillion dollars worth hateful of vexatious litigation eating up my time. After all that I'm not intimidated by you. I reject your absurd accusations, but if they were true by this time you have only yourself to blame. If whatever you thought should have been done was doable and valuable, why didn't you do it and why isn't anyone using it? I certainly didn't stop you.
True, I've done nothing, but that's still a lot less damage than you have done. I only wish you had been as lazy.
We will never forget the censorship and gas-lighting that you orchestrated. You did stop good people from making positive change in the world. I won't appeal to your conscience - I don't believe it's there - so I'll settle for hoping that you are hounded rather than haunted for the rest of your life. You deserve that much and more.
In any case, a fork of Bitcoin with bigger blocks has existed for years and the market doesn't prefer it despite all the big names and companies hyping it up at the time of the split.
Satoshi left Bitcoin so there wouldn't be an appeal to authority so maybe your argument isn't as strong as you think it is.
GGP was CTO of Blockstream (https://blog.blockstream.com/en-blockstream-bids-farewell-to...)