> No golden parachutes, no deferred bonuses, no pensions
In my opinion, hard cutoffs like this create perverse incentives, but there definitely need to be consequences for actions.
I do think that you shouldn't be doing anything to destroy their lives "no pension" (outside of any judicial outcomes); but it should be sufficiently comprehensive such that you can declare both that no one profited from malfeasance/incompetance and that poeple in positions governed by these provisions are strongly encouraged to make sure that they don't fall foul of them.