Isn't JD Vance married to an Indian lady?
The article is very interesting and smart and well written with some really great ideas, but I think there may be a little bit of hyperbole which Im still ok with.
Isn't JD Vance married to an Indian lady?
The article is very interesting and smart and well written with some really great ideas, but I think there may be a little bit of hyperbole which Im still ok with.
These days we have more sophisticated control mechanisms involving government regulations.
Walking away from it would be, uh, problematic. Especially for the demographic who voted most enthusiastically for this administration. Which might make for some poetic justice, but a lot of others would also find themselves in dire straits.
One can clearly offer these differentiations, but it's all so much Utopian Progressivism that has simply not withstood the test of time, if we're being honest about the debt.
But honesty scales like Utopian Progressivism, so expect continued ignoring of the problem until the economy 'splodes and the "experts" stand around looking aghast.
But this gets at why precedent is such a cautionary thing.
What's your point? One GOP married a brown-skinned person, so they all get a pass?
This is the equivalent of a person on the right calling all liberals "coastal elites that support child molestation"
It's a tribal trait to demonize the "other".
And I say that being mostly a leftist.