They study the other common forms of death/injury. If anything, giving guns a special exemption from scrutiny is the political move.
So? We have more than one law enforcement agency, too.
> Should the department of HUD send rockets to space? Of course not.
Should the department of Health touch on a major health issue? Of course.
Have you never needed another department’s assistance with a work task?
The CDC and HUD (and EPA and DOJ and whatnot) would both be involved in lead exposure in children, for example. Different aspects of the same big problem.
The folks who want us to pretend gun violence isn’t a problem also oppose mental health funding.
So if they can study gun violence while still accomplishing their core mission without distraction, surely you’d be ok with this, I presume?
I mean, are we doing learned helplessness tonight or just pretending for rhetorical reasons or...?
And given the well-documented copycat-killer phenomenon, modeling it similarly to an epidemic is very reasonable.
- shooting deaths are not a gun problem, they’re a mental health problem. So we won’t fix anything by solving the gun problem.
“Ok… can we solve the mental health problem, then?”
- also no.
Does 47,000 deaths per year (13.7 per 100,000) not qualify?
Why are you even complaining (trolling)? After decades of pressure, the gun lobby (NRA, GOA, etc) has finally eliminated CDC's role in researching gun violence.
Is outright victory insufficient? Must you continue to belabor the point?