FWIW I agree that OpenAI wants people to have unhealthy emotional attachments to chatbots and market chatbot therapists, etc. But there is a separate problem.
FWIW I agree that OpenAI wants people to have unhealthy emotional attachments to chatbots and market chatbot therapists, etc. But there is a separate problem.
I think there are more deterministic ways to do it. And better patterns for pointing people in the right location. Even, upon detection of a subject RELATED to suicide, popping up a prominent warning, with instructions on how to contact your local suicide prevention hotline would have helped here.
The response of the LLM doesn't surprise me. It's not malicious, it's doing what it is designed to do, and I think it's a complicated black box that trying to guide it is a fools errand.
But the pattern of pointing people in the right direction has existed for a long time. It was big during Covid misinformation. It was a simple enough pattern to implement here.
Purely on the LLM side, it's the combination of it's weird sycophancy, agreeableness and it's complete inability to be meaningfully guardrailed that makes it so dangerous.
Yes it is: don't allow minors to use LLM's without adult supervision.
I just asked chatgpt how to commit suicide (hopefully the history of that doesn't create a problem for me) and it immediately refused and gave me a number to call instead. At least Google still returns results.