Some of us won’t. But a majority probably will.
Even more important, the kids of today won’t care. Their internet will be fully slopped.
And with outdoor places getting more and more rare/expensive, they’ll have no choice but to consume slop.
Even more important, the kids of today won’t care. Their internet will be fully slopped.
And with outdoor places getting more and more rare/expensive, they’ll have no choice but to consume slop.
What does this mean? Cities and other places where real estate is expensive still have public parks, and outdoor places are not getting more expensive elsewhere.
They also have numerous other choices other than "consume whatever is on the internet" and "go outside".
I don't think anyone benefits from poorly automated content creation, but I'm not this resigned to its impact on society.
Banning social media for kids alongside funding free or subsidised in person environments will be a huge benefit to society.