That and when most governments "nationalise" corporations they seize them and don't give the owners/shareholders anything.
That and when most governments "nationalise" corporations they seize them and don't give the owners/shareholders anything.
Versus in most nationalisation events their shares simply get taken away or diluted to pennies.
And it's the standard refrain: if this money helps Intel get back on its feet, the stock price will go up, presumably to the point dilution won't matter.
But who cares, really? If it's true that Intel is actually strategically important to the US, the shareholders are irrelevant if need be. It's not a great outcome, sure, but Intel has been mismanaged for a long time, and investors should have known the risks of investing in a company like that.
https://www.intc.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/1748/...
First you get the money, then you get the power.
Money is fungible, but power isn't. Arguably, taking away my power is an affront to my human rights. Taking my money is an affront, but it never was my money to begin with, as I don't control the value or creation of it. My rights are inalienable.