> Wind and solar is less than 7% combined on that graph, so either wind and solar aren't relevant and nuclear isn't relevant, or they're both relevant.

Renewables are relevant given their trajectory and that they make up ~90% of new installations due to being the by far best option today.

Grid infrastructure has a lifespan of a couple decades. We are seeing a complete disruption of the grid, but it will take a couple of decades for everything to shake out as the existing fleet of fossil and nuclear plants ages out.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=64586

> France is practically closed loop, and France is 55% of Europe's nuclear generation.

Of course forgetting how France uses Russia for this reprocessing. But relying on Russia for your energy supply chain is fine as long as it is nuclear power?