This really sounds like it was generated by an LLM. "X isn't a Y. It's a Z", examples that don't make any sense (why would it think you're a farmer?), etc. Perhaps not the most surprising thing that an LLM advocates for itself...

The whole notion of "Vibe Coding" was to accept the output regardless and prompt forward. Anything else is moving the goalposts. If you can't accept the outputs and you need an in-depth knowledge of code then these LLMs are not ready for this task.

#4 for sure. Check in the vital body of each issue in a subdir and point AI to it.

#6 isn’t useful when you’re doing highly technical or international work. I’ve seen internal glossaries with 6000 terms, maybe 5 colliding acronyms, used while coding.

Why aren't they a staff SWE if they're all of the sudden started shipping 10X faster?

1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 are good.

5 is just a platitude

6 is nonsense

Overall pretty good advice to give to your newly hired vibe-coding juniors. Just don't scare them or demoralize them.