Which part of the CHIPS act says companies receiving funds have to give the government 10% of the company to continue receiving funds?
One can argue how to interpret "financial assistance" broadly, which is exactly what the administration has done.
The money was already granted. Trump threatened the CEO personally and then they came to this agreement ex post facto.
You can? So some years later they can change it again? Where's the trust?
However in case of democrats president Supreme Court will be surprisingly fast on issuing emergency decisions and stopping executive actions…