Tell me about this "quirk" and winning by "default" (and how this never applied to other recent elections).
The electorate legitimately did not want these people or their policies, they effectively weren't given a choice. To call that democracy delegtimizes democratic elections.
The last time the Lib Dems got a taste of power in 2010 it was by going into coalition with the Tories at the cost of dumping key election pledges. Next election they were dumped by the public and their leader Nick Clegg was hired by Meta - presumably for his connections as he has no particular talent to sell.
I say that those who didn't vote knew it was a foregone conclusion and would have voted in the same proportion as those who did vote.
> so most people just didn't vote because they didn't see anyone running to vote for.
Probably shoulda voted then
What percent of the electorate voting for the biggest party would be acceptable to you?