>And unlike the human who spent multiple hours writing that article, an LLM would have linked to the original study
Or made up a fake citation, complete with fake or unrelated author names, on the spot
Or made up a fake citation, complete with fake or unrelated author names, on the spot
Edit - just used Pro, gave me a direct source. Who knows...
Mmmh, that would have been my take as well up to around end of Q1 2025.
Theses days, the flagship LLM's have reduced hallucination by quite a bit, and are also way better at citing sources (you sometimes have to nudge them).
ChatGPT 5 has been very decent on that particular axis.