Based on Apple's acquisition of FoundationDB, this seems like it will have negative consequences for public development of OPA.
What are the counterexamples, where Apple acquiring a project results in it being more open with sustained development?
What are the counterexamples, where Apple acquiring a project results in it being more open with sustained development?
From this announcement, they are going to open source the enterprise version of this tool, which was also previously closed source.
FoundationDB wasn't even Open Source when Apple acquired them.
How did this idiotic, uninformed meme come about exactly?
This leaves me quite bummed out. After Oso[0] went from a superb open source policy evaluation solution to one that's completely closed, OPA is what I'm typically reaching for now, but now it'll likely be on life support.