Test your Startup idea, Quick and Cheap. No coding needed.
lookaft.com
lookaft.com
Wait, so did you actually build this? Or is this just an example of you testing your startup idea without coding it?
edit: oh man, did you steal that dashboard from Voziq? http://www.voziq.com/social-media-monitoring-tools/ I don't know if this is hustling (good) or shady (bad).
edit 2: odd that someone else used that exact same picture for a testimonial, but gave the guy a different name and title: http://www.fusebill.com/legal/terms.aspx
For what it's worth, HN is very good about giving early pre-MVP feedback -- there's no need for deception.
It does need further work and polish, but everyone that is using the app has given great feedback that it's a really useful tool.
The other image and title came from one of our users. I've emailed him to see what the deal is.
http://unbouncepages-com.s3.amazonaws.com/www.lookaft.com/te...
Isn't this product essentially supposed to compete with unbounce?
edit: I'm guessing that it's because the other option on google image search for "person" don't look that genuine. https://www.google.com/search?num=10&hl=en&authuser=...
But I'm left with an uneasy feeling when folks take the "tease" approach that this is advocating (and, currently, using).
* Here's an idea!
* Here's why it's great!
* Sign up now!
* Ohhhhh sorry -- not actually available. Give us your email though (and thanks for the conversion data point).
I know for me, it feels dishonest. There's no harm actually done - you haven't truly "baited and switched", but you've baited and not delivered, and I think that makes a poor first impression. It sets a tone of dishonesty with your earliest (potential) customers.
I don't know the answer - I wish I did. I understand that if you change the messaging ("Let us know if this sounds good" vs. "Sign up now!") you distort your experimental conversion data, but I think it's worth considering the cost of presenting a poor first impression vs. running the test.
Perhaps there's a middle ground?
I haven't come to a conclusion other than it's physically not really doing anyone any harm and if one stunning start up comes of it that changes the world for the better, then it has to be worth it.
You are letting the visitor know before they drop you their email that you're not ready for them and so you aren't deceiving them.
This is not true. Your product states that "Due to demand we have had to introduce a waiting list... Because of the of demand we have had, due to the success of Entrepreneurs, Inventors and Business People using LookAft, we need to add you to a queue to get going."
The above statement is very different than "Our product isn't ready yet, but if you're interested you can sign up here...", and is rather deceptive. It makes me think you have a functioning product and an already active user base when that simply isn't the truth.
All this isn't to discourage your efforts, but maybe to get you to rethink the way you approach your potential customers. Keep at it, but first and foremost -- be honest.
Great to see Buffer has been an inspiration. If anyone is interested, the screenshot comes from this post with the full details of how I used this method to go from idea to paying customers in 7 weeks: http://blog.bufferapp.com/idea-to-paying-customers-in-7-week...
YABPV (yet another buffer publicity vehicle). And I mean that with admiration btw.
Buffer is awesome, keep up the good work on that. If you have any issues with me using the image please let me know.
No issues at all, quite the opposite - I'm super happy it inspired this! Let me know if I can ever help with anything, more than happy to jump on a Skype call if it might be good. My email is in my profile ;)
I think it's fine that you make these things up but please word it another way. As it is now, anyone can see that it's BS. Also, if you have 25 paying customers, do you really need to make John Hobbs of Uni CRM up?
I've often thought about that idea for business ideas. Spend $100 on a Google Adwords campaign advertising your business in 2 or 3 different models, and see which one has the most interest.
It also includes a preliminary pricing page so you can test price points (which is obviously important to see if a product vs customer acquisition balance works out) by seeing how many people click through each price point and give their emails.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.
Obviously my priority is to keep the service running for the people who have already applied.
Classy.
I think a "ask for forgiveness rather than permission" mindset can be the most beneficial here.
In my mind, there's no doubt that there is much more value in terms of validation that you can obtain through using this method rather than telling people up front that the product isn't ready yet (some people just love to try new things, and that's much worse validation for whether the product will work).
The key I found is communication. If you are very open and ask for feedback, and if you have a two way conversation with the person after they give you their email, then you can actually get them on your side even more since you've had personal contact.
Basically, you create a landing page for your product or service using a super quick and easy template that we host. This page then links to a pricing page and then when the visitor clicks get started they are redirected to a page that allows them to add their email and receive an invite when the product / service is ready.
What we do which is special, is take all data from the % of users that clicked through and through what price point and show this information visually on your dashboard so you can make an informed decision whether your startup idea / product is viable.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.