Nah-- I feel like I have my eyes pretty wide open about the shortcomings of LLMs (but still find them useful often).
But any argument seeking to dunk on LLMs needs to not also apply equally to the alternative (humans).
But any argument seeking to dunk on LLMs needs to not also apply equally to the alternative (humans).
Maybe you can argue we don't use statistical completion and prediction as a heavy underpinning to our reasoning, but that's hardly settled.
Nah-- you will have to try harder to make an argument that really focuses on how LLMs are different from the alternative.