It could just be that they translated from their original language to English and got that as a byproduct. Many such cases.
I for one appreciate such comments, given the guidelines to avoid submission summaries.
You're free to opine on the reason for downvotes too. This metacomment, however, is more noise than signal.
One line summaries of comprehensible articles can get downvoted because they don't add value beyond what's already very clear from the article.
and the fact that multiple people upvoted my comment at a minimum suggests others also believe it to be a possible explanation
i have no idea why you've chosen this particular hill to die on, when neither of us stands to profit from this protracted exchange
Either way, I didn't even downvote the OP so you're beeping at the wrong human