it's rude to show people your llm output
I pasted the output so a ton of people wouldn't repeat the same question to ChatGPT and burn a ton of CO2 to get the same answer.
I didn't paste the query since I didn't find it interesting.
And I didn't fact check because I didn't have the time. I was walking and had a few seconds to just do this on my phone.
Not sure how this was rude, I certainly didn't intend it to be...
It's a weird thing to wonder after so many people expressed their dislike of the upthread low-effort comment with a down vote (and then another voiced a more explicit opinion). The point is that a reader may want to know that the text they're reading is something a human took the time to write themselves. That fact is what makes it valuable.
> pncnmnp seems happy
They just haven't commented. There is no reason to attribute this specific motive to that fact.
The reader may also simply want information that helps them.
> They just haven't commented.
Yes, they did.
The reader will generally want at least a cursory verification that it is information that helps, which dataflow didn't try to do.
Especially when you're looking for specific documents and you don't check if the documents are real. (dataflow's third one doesn't appear to be.)
Directly posting the random text generated by the LLM is more annoying. I mean, they didn’t even vouch or it or verify that it was right.
Also, I quite love it when people clearly demarcate which part of their content came from an LLM, and specifies which model.
The little citation carries a huge amount of useful information.
The folks who don't like AI should like it too, as they can easily filter the content.