There is no death. It's just an idea in awareness.
You were dead for infinity.
How can you be dead for infinity and alive now. Makes no sense.
Only explanation is it's infinite.
0 - 1 second alive is not 1 second.
It's infinite.
You were dead for infinity.
How can you be dead for infinity and alive now. Makes no sense.
Only explanation is it's infinite.
0 - 1 second alive is not 1 second.
It's infinite.
I stood beside the caskets of my mother, my father and my grandmother. Trust me, life is finite and death is real.
Please stop trying to be clever, this is puerile and tedious.
Yeah, many of us have stood beside, behind, slightly in front of, or perhaps at some angle to the caskets of some loved one. This makes us exactly zero percent experts in how final death is, since of course we have no real clue one way or the other. That's a statement of fact, taking all religion aside. Given that we don't yet know what consciousness itself is or what it emerges from for our perception, we can't say anything certain about its nature after death. You're trying to be clever with weary cynicism, but know no better than anyone else.
I get the impression that you were trying for something cryptic and profound sounding, but went a little too overboard and lost the underlying message, leaving the reader trying to decipher a bunch of meaningless 2 to 4 word sentences.
But if you are serious look into advaita or madhyamaka.
Oh, you've now edited your comment from calling yourself a "master" to something else entirely (while still not answering the question I asked).
I am writing to impress you anonymous stranger. Maybe for karna farming. Or to inflate my ego.
Or maybe there is a pointing that you can't grasp yet that inan trying to convey.
Or I am full of shit.
Thus, of your three options, two are much more likely, and one much less likely.
I have told what I think is true from my understanding.
If you don't understand it or thinks it's bs it's fine. Just leave it.
My goal is not to awaken any of you.
I just posted it because it felt true to me.
And if someone else resonated that's good enough.
I understand when you say it sounds BS and empty.
I would have said the same a few years back.
And I don't think anything I have written could have changed that opinion.
You see the words just appear as patterns to you.
The meaning is generated internally.
Nothing in what you wrote makes sense. Do you know what a double negative is?
But you can always copy paste my replies to your modern LLMS and ask what I am talking about. Maybe they can settle for sure I am full of shit..
The question is settled; a software LLM is not needed.
You are focused on trying to understand truth through axioms which you have already assumed to be be true.
Can't you see the contradiction?
It's an argument that is akin to, but not the same as, "the map is not the territory."