> the end result is seriously faster
Do you have a ballpark value of how much faster Rust is? Also I wonder if OxCaml will be roughly as fast with less effort.
Do you have a ballpark value of how much faster Rust is? Also I wonder if OxCaml will be roughly as fast with less effort.
Of course, all of this was mostly unneeded, but I just wanted to find out what am I getting myself into, and I was very happy with the result. My move to Rust was mostly not because of speed, but I still needed a fast language (where OCaml qualifies). This was also before the days of multicore OCaml, so nowadays it would matter even less.
How much of that do you think comes from reduced allocations/indirections? Now I really want to try out OxCaml and see if I can approximate this speedup by picking up low hanging fruits.