Especially if you do it by not even arguing with them, but by Socratic style questioning of their point of view - until it becomes obvious that their point of view is incoherent.
You haven’t proven that your point of view is any more coherent, just attacked theirs while refusing to engage about your own — which is the behavior they’re responding to with aggression.
Try learning how someone who professes to be a follower of Christ but who also supports the current administration, what they think Christ’s teachings were for instance.
I mean if you've just proven that my words and logic are actually unsound and incoherent how can I use that very logic with you? If you add to this that most people want to win an argument (when facing opposite point of view) then what's left to win but violence ?
And to be very honest even the one using the socratic method may not be of pure intention.
In both cases I ve rarely (not never) met someone who admitted right away to be wrong as the conclusion of a argument.
- every successful general and politician ever
(I don't think enough people take the lesson from this of "it doesn't matter if you're right if you're also really obnoxious about it")
The lesson I took was, he would rather be dead right, than a live liar.
We all end up making that choice at some point, if we recognize it or not.