UK government asks people to delete old emails to reduce data centres' water use
thejournal.ie
thejournal.ie
As to the efficacy of the recommendation:
From The Verge's coverage[1]:
"The Environment Agency didn’t immediately respond to an inquiry from The Verge about how much water it thought deleting files might save, nor how much water data centers that store files or train AI use in the UK’s drought-affected areas."
And Tom's Hardware's[2]:
"Perhaps more pertinently, the advice rings hollow because it's likely not very sensible. While it's true that data centers do consume large amounts of water through evaporative cooling (where it's used), the vast majority of this power draw comes from CPU and GPU computation, not the storage of pictures and emails. Once the data is stored, the storage devices generate very little heat and are often spun down (placed into low- or no-power states) and called upon only when needed."
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thick_of_It
1: https://www.theverge.com/science/758275/drought-delete-files...
2: https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/uk-government-ine...
An average person's entire archive would likely easily fit on a small 64 microsd card. Which is like $10 bucks...
Also this is data at rest mostly that doesn't get accessed. Deleting it would save maybe a square millimetre of spinning rust somewhere but not meaningful amounts of power (that rust still has to spin)
The storage densities are constantly increasing to keep costs low. SMR drives have significantly pushed up the achievable densities at the cost of write performance which matters little for cold data. The 1PB/node mark was breached a few years ago.
Few players have the budget to store these volumes of data on flash, especially since you're always erasure coding for redundancy which adds anywhere from 50-100% storage overhead, depending on other tradeoffs.
HDDs are a remarkable invention and not going anywhere soon. Heck, I think tapes aren't dead either.