Reporters killed and foreigners barred in Israel's battle for Gaza narrative
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
This seems awfully intentional.
Aljazeera is hardly neutral on this conflict either.
The Israelis have been demonstrably dishonest about this conflict so I'd take anything they release about their war crimes with a grain of salt.
And how do you seriously think pro-Israel journalists would be treated by Hamas?
What is indisputable is that Israel has deliberately killed 10's of thousands of civilians, possibly 100's of thousands and has persecuted millions of Palestinians.
Care to share specifics on your Al Jazeera claims?
Anas Al-Sharif conveniently ignored Gazans’ protests against Hamas throughout the war. Courage, apparently, applies only to reporting what Hamas wants the world to hear.
And there is actually no confusion about the "Palestinians" in the Arab world - as Egypt annexed Gaza, they made it pretty clear that they will not allow an Arab state there and also that they will never accept Gazans as their equals. Same happened in Jordan after annexing the West Bank. No one really wants them in the region, because Palestinians are THE source of instability and they cost the Arab countries actually way too much. And basically the only reason why they support the Palestinian cause is the chance for political emancipation of the united Arab world from the western dominance.
Note to Moderators - This is not a Dupe (in my opinion and I will respect your greater insight) from what I have seen published on this site so far. The subject of this article covers an important starting point for discussion; that of the power of narrative control, selective publication and control of access to information.
Lots of downvotes but no evidence I'm incorrect .... What does a person make of that ?
What are you trying to communicate here?
I actually went thru my last few pages of comments - the word has been used a very low percentage of time - just a few times ... so hardly "lots "