An opinion piece about a standardized description of consciousness

docs.google.com

3 pointsTrenthug3 comments

This document presents an opinion piece about a standardized/objective description of consciousness given in a definite manner.Its propositions might seem to share aspects with Karl Friston's hypothesis of brains as Bayesian inference machines , Wittgenstein's private language discussions and Tononi's usage of a complexity metric in Integrated Information Theory (IIT).

So is it a definition or an opinion piece about a definition?

What do you mean by "given in a definite manner"?

It's also unreadable on a phone and apparently you've already posted it many times.

I'd suggest first clearing the mark of creating a readable web document if you want to define (self-) consciousness.

It does seem to need some edits, might take some time,any thoughts on the propositions made in it ?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com