$30k Ford EV truck due in 2027 with much-simpler production process
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
For example, here's a quote from last year:
"We're deep in the development of our next generation of vehicles that we believe will be affordable, high volume and great for our business. On the U.S. retail side, the sweet spot that has emerged is small- and medium-sized trucks and utilities. These vehicles use case fits perfectly for EVs, daily commuters, well suited as a second vehicle in the household.
They require smaller, much lower cost batteries. These vehicles can be offered at lower prices to help adoption of EVs for the customers who really appreciate their lower operating costs. But for larger retail electric utilities, the economics are unresolvable."
Also from last year:
"We believe smaller, more affordable vehicles are the way to go for EV and volume.
Why? Because the math is completely different than ICE. In ICE, the business we've been in for 120 years, the bigger the vehicle, the higher the margin. But it's exactly the opposite for EVs. The larger the vehicle, the bigger the battery, the more pressure on margin because customers will not pay a premium for those larger batteries."
So much for 'home of the free market' that between regulatory capture and broken dealership models and import tariffs the competition looks so bad.
When people ask "where are the <$30k cars?" they generally mean new cars, because the more $30k cars that are sold new should imply more <$10k gently used cars on the market. The used market doesn't get cars that people can't afford to buy new in the first place.
You mean a design so common among other car makers (GM, Hyundai) that there’s a word (and a Wikipedia page) for it?
Skateboard: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skateboard_(automotive_platfor...
Though with some current trends - Ford may really need it both sooner, and cheaper.
Hard to say what the minimum might be. 200 miles?