The whole article seems to hinge on the idea that cursor is unsustainable and a large driver of revenue for AI companies. It seems to think that if cursor dies, so does the revenue.

I don't see that- cursor will die by losing market share, not by the death of the market. Agentic coding as a market will continue to grow and if Claude remains competitive then Anthropic will do just fine.

The author doesn't understand how much money is in the it industry and free market.

It doesn't matter if companies next to Google, Ms, meta make it.

Google does ai sustainable enough alone.