So these people decide to become homeless instead of moving to a nearby area with a lower cost of living?
Basically at what point do you decide you're "failing" (no moral valence intended) in one area in which you have a support network that you're willing to risk moving to a totally new area and starting over? At that point, do you have the resources required to do so successfully?
And how good is that support network if it leaves you camping in a tent down by the river? I'm not taking about moving across the state, just down the road a bit.
Someone who doesn't have a job can't afford "substantially cheaper" housing anyway.
That's great! But if you have no place to store your clean (or dirty) clothes, or to shower, how many landlords are going to rent to you? How many employers are going to offer you a job?
Those are not rhetorical questions.
Nope. Definitely not talking about homeless poeple. Gotcha.