I do not understand how they could develop a language inspired by OCaml but not bring over labeled function arguments. A real L when it comes to ergonomics.
And they just have no plans to ever fix this??
And they just have no plans to ever fix this??
Is this what you desire?
Named Arguments[0]
Arguments for methods can be specified by position in a
comma-separated argument list, or they can be passed to a
method explicitly by providing the name, followed by an
equal sign and the value to be passed in. If specified by
providing the name, they can appear in a different order
from that used in the declaration.
> Named arguments are allowed only for methods, not for let-bound functions, function values, or lambda expressions.
Named arguments are allowed only for methods, not for
let-bound functions, function values, or lambda expressions.
Still, the original concern was identified thusly:
>> I do not understand how they could develop a language inspired by OCaml but not bring over labeled function arguments.