I don't remember what is in it, but if you want to discredit the Protocols saying "it predicted X" when X then happened is not the easy path. The main counterargument is the idea that organisation could be race-based vs pointing at a voluntary society. If you blame Jews on racial grounds they can't very well disassociate from being Jews.

> Yes, women in Europe are very corrupted. Amazing insight there.

Not much of an insight, it's generally accepted. By the standards of conservative Europe in 1800AD they're probably more than corrupted, society seems to have gone through the most extreme cases for how they imagined change might evolve. It isn't a very accurately chosen word but if you dig in to what he would have meant the boxes got ticked. The stats I've seen suggest European women are mostly godless, probably don't respect men all that much and on average are not having enough children to sustain the population. These days we'd probably call all that a win, but he wasn't wrong that people were working to bring such a world around.