Hacker News Reader

Comment by Zigurd | Hacker News Reader

The words "woman" or "women" appear zero times on this thread up to my composing this post. The word "female" appears once in the context of how to breed a next generation without any women.

That's why none of this is going to work. Is that blunt enough for you? Have any of you asked a woman about the utter insanity of generation ships? Do you think maybe the tech industry still needs to do some work about gender equality, and the resulting quality of decision-making in tech management and investment?

View on HN

? The page doesn’t mention man either. It says people. Looks like nearly half the judges are women, and the top 2 winning entries look like majority women.

Point taken, but I was referring to the sausage fest here

> Have any of you asked a woman about the utter insanity of generation ships?

Isn’t submitting the proposal to a jury that is 40% women explicitly asking women?

It's not going to work because the energy requirements of reaching another habitable planet through interstellar space are mind-bogglingly high.

You need to be able to run a fusion reaction in space, for 100+ years and have absolutely nothing in the system break or require maintenance.

Until you do this, these spaceship competitions are just fancy CGI renders.

I think with highly enriched uranium you could definitely power a (set of spare) fishion reactors for that long during transit with reasonable mass budget.

Fission is the way to go for this for its general simplicity of design and it can self start by manually moving control rods. I never see anyone talking about they are going to restart a fusion reactor if it ever goes offline for any reason.

My thought is to use fission for powering the ship, and fusion for the drive. The fission reactors can start the fusion drive as needed and you can have multiple portable fission reactors like the NASA kilopower designs in an offline/inert state that could be powered on in an emergency.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com