Them being forced to do things due to the dictatorship is not a compelling argument, as people are forced to do things in Western societies too, via other external factors like risk of poverty and hunger.
What does this have to do with Apple or manufacturing investment pledges? Who is going hungry?
that is the point --- precisely because the usual mechanisms of enforcement do not apply, there will be no accountability for Apple.
Accountability of what and to whom? Which law are they supposedly breaking?
I think we're so far down the discussion thread, that we've forgotten that we're skeptical about whether Apple will be held accountable to their American investment promises...