Instagram public accounts with less than 1k followers can no longer go live | Hacker News Reader

Instagram public accounts with less than 1k followers can no longer go live

engadget.com

19 pointsbookofjoe12 comments

This could be a way of censoring regular people who "report" on live events such as police brutality, ethnic cleansing, etc.

Fewer than

>'Fewer' versus 'less'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fewer_versus_less

>However, modern linguistics has shown that idiomatic past and current usage consists of the word less being used with both countable nouns and uncountable nouns.

Modern linguistics will also say that literally meaning the same as figuratively is fine, and "I could care less" is perfectly acceptable to convey not caring; if you dare question it, you're just declared wrong by the descriptivist cargo cult. Proof by authority, the modern linguist's favourite logical fallacy!

But is prevalent usage not a valid measure of acceptability? And is acceptable not the equivalent of correct?

For example, "nonplussed" has evolved to mean — correctly — not only its original meaning of "surprised" but also its polar opposite.

> But is prevalent usage not a valid measure of acceptability?

It's exactly this central dogma that I question; an arbitrary number of people can be wrong about something without it magically becoming correct.

The final nail in the coffin is: if anything goes as long as it's popular, then I can just go right ahead and be "wrong" with my preferred usage of logic (could care less) and consistency (up means up, you can't suddenly declare it now also means down) anyway.

Before literally came to mean figuratively, there was a transition period where that usage was wrong, and then suddenly became correct when some imaginary threshold was crossed; so I'm just temporarily wrong and will, any day now, also see my preferred meaning of "up" (to mean down, of course with no new word for the original meaning of down because why bother with anything sensible) come to be canon. I just need to make enough viral tiktok videos and then truth vs falsity is my plaything :)

> It's exactly this central dogma that I question; an arbitrary number of people can be wrong about something without it magically becoming correct.

Language is arbitrary and when enough people agree that a word means something, it does.

Do you insist that "nice" can only mean "foolish" and not kind because that was its original meaning, or do you accept that it now means "kind"?

If the latter, you also actually agree that the meaning of words can change once enough people use them a new way.

Go read some prose from 200 years ago and tell me that consensuses don’t chsnge

What makes "less than" wrong? Interested to learn.

It's that followers are countable. "Less" and "fewer" get more mixed in usage, but "many" vs "much" is more clear IMO. "I don't have many followers" is considered more proper than "I don't have much followers" (but you could say "I don't have much of a following").

Pulling up the ladder after getting in to the tree house.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com