> Certainly turing completeness does not guarantee a nice language
Actually, I would say exactly the opposite. Turing completeness guarantees you the ability to write a Lisp interpreter in that language, and thereby have "a nice language."
Actually, I would say exactly the opposite. Turing completeness guarantees you the ability to write a Lisp interpreter in that language, and thereby have "a nice language."
Also, I'd say that any language which requires me to write a Lisp interpreter to be nice is not a "nice language".