Do we still do 'citation needed' around here? Find me one serious person who has ever argued for equality of outcomes. Even fucking Lenin said "He who does not work shall not eat".
Without commenting on or evaluating the merits or demerits of the argument, here is a representative example:
https://onlinepublichealth.gwu.edu/resources/equity-vs-equal...
“Equality means each individual or group of people is given the same resources or opportunities. Equity recognizes that each person has different circumstances and allocates the exact resources and opportunities needed to reach an equal outcome.”
This was a widely held stance in certain circles. Additional examples in different domains/disciplines are not difficult to find.
The main argument in favour of DEI is a cartoon about apples. We're all doomed, I guess.
When white and Asian males are eliminated if they didn’t attend a top-20 computer science program, but the existence of a degree doesn’t matter for anyone else, that’s equality of outcome.
When the stated goal of HR during an all-hands is literally to facilitate equality of outcomes.
Name them. Please. Why do you all refuse to tell me who's doing all the bad things you're so worried about?
Why do you use slurs here? Using slurs is a sign you aren't arguing in good faith here, meaning even if people provided that evidence you probably wouldn't change your mind, you are just trying to win this argument.