Chess.com but for debating(AI judge who wins)

Chess implies a game, of which there are plenty already.

The novelty would be a conversation platform that overcomes the primitive urge to game everything.

I don't understand can you use simpler words please

Chess implies a game. Conversations that are games already exist. It makes your idea dumb. Dumb ideas deserve no space.

Conversations that are not games are rare. That's an idea worth pursuing.

---

I'm not afraid of games. I can play them if it is the only thing available. In fact, I can play the most terrifying role (for gamers): the role of ending the game and opening up space for reality.

so you're suggesting removing the elo/ranking feature?

I was suggesting you had chosen a bad name. But then, you gamed the conversation, and assumed that the bad name follows the bad idea.

What I did to describe it, would be the equivalent of an en passant pawn capture, in chess terms.

Welp, turns out there's a lot of n-words being dropped in the discord. Do not recommend joining.

discord server in the website if u wanna talk more in depth/if u want to help

"explosivediarrheapig" is a terrific discord handle.

ikr(whats urs).