> Gazans still hold Israeli hostages,
Hamas, not Gazans. Nice play with language.
> hostages,
The thousands of Palestinian "administrative detainees" held without charge in Israel, are not hostages?
Hamas, not Gazans. Nice play with language.
> hostages,
The thousands of Palestinian "administrative detainees" held without charge in Israel, are not hostages?
If 71% civilian supports some group, then it is not a terrorist group but a government, and using Gazans isn't an overreach.
[1]: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/11/amid-the-cease...
Also support for one group does not imply that all supporters take up arms in solidarity with said group.
Hamas claimed non-Hamas groups and some civilians held hostages. Some hostages were found in captivity guarded by "civilians". Groups like PIJ held hostages.
So what's a nice catch-all term for the above groups?
So saying they're Gazans covers all the groups, it doesn't say all Gazans, just that the ones doing it are Gazans.
"Israelis have created a man-made starvation with particular emphasis on blocking baby formula and other life-saving essentials from Gaza."
I'm not saying all Israelis. Just following your logic.
No, it's not all Israelis. It's the IDF (IOF) under instruction from the maniacs in charge.