Poll: Should Apple accept an app that tracks drone kills?

It's not about this specific application -- it's about the proverbial slippery slope. If an app that tracks drone strikes, based on publicly available information, can be excluded, where do we draw the line? And more to the point, where do they (i.e. Apple) draw the line, and what qualifies them to be drawing it?

Just to test the waters, I'd like to see an app that automatically locates the nearest abortion clinic. Also an app that automatically locates the nearest gun store. But these apps should be submitted by different people, at different times, just to see how differently they're treated.

But I should be happy about this brouhaha -- in the final analysis, incidents like this can only increase Android's market share, because no single company can exclude an application from Android, as Apple rather arbitrarily does with apps designed for their platform.

As shocked as I am at this, I'm shocked at the response to the poll!

Personally these drones are just scary all around as once one country uses this tech others will follow.

What's going to stop a more advanced drone from attacking other nations other then how the US uses them now?

Iran purportedly got their hands on one these drones...

It's a censored walled garden where nary a controversial idea should be shared. Apple bans all kinds of things from its playground, always has, always will. Let Apple and its users reap what they sow.

It's Apple's store I think they can decide to sell whatever they want and the consumer can decide to goto a different store (platform) if Apple isn't meeting their needs.

I think the reason they rejected it is that there is no utility to it. Just open the webpage. They very often reject applications that duplicate web functionality.

Also, what about a normal news app? They report unpleasant goings on in the world like drone killings.

They probably should!

Counter-poll: should news organizations return to reporting actual news?