* brainstorm
* reword hard sections they garbage’d out on accident
* catch typos / formatting / flow issues
But only because they chose strong transparency about their activity?I had the same reaction, which is that I do not want to read something that was written by an LLM and immediately backed out - which is great I really appreciate their disclaimer, it helped me not waste my time on things I don’t personally want to consume.
You might not think that’s sufficient for a disclaimer; but if I was worried about AI use and wanted to be super duper up front, I would put that on my own journal if I used it for the things I mentioned.
HN also drank the crypto-crap and NFT Kool-Aid. It's nice to see people able to not follow the groupthink.
This is like something my racist grandmother says when I tell her a historical fact and she says you can’t tell me all plantation owners are racist because you didn’t meet them all or something similar ridiculous.
People can make statements from experience. Claiming HN doesn’t love blogs is out of touch.
The statement being made is "Very anti-HN thinking to be posted here."
Rather than present useless analogies, engage with what's actually been presented. I didn't ask about your grandmother.
I guess I can’t make the statement that all HN users are not jerks.
Calling analogies useless because you won’t engage with others who disagree is rich.