> The first question the anti-Israel genocide chorus needs to answer is: Why isn’t the death count higher?
If it's a genocide, it's the most ineptly executed genocide ever. From the same entity that humiliated and defanged both Hezbollah and Iran in days.
It really doesn't fit. It does look like a war though. Yes wars are horrible, and lots of bad things happen in wars.
> If it's a genocide, it's the most ineptly executed genocide ever.
Not if the intent is to kill as many as possible in a way that's politically acceptable.
Being overly efficient in their genocide would make it hard for people like you to defend their actions.
How can it be a "slow, sneaky genocide" if the population is increasing? Has any other group faced serious genocide accusations in relation to an increasing population?
And the lack of trust in Israel's government is due to how little effort they seem to put into distinguishing between civilian and enemy combatant while in control of all surrounding borders.
If things continue as they have, then the number of starvations is about to increase dramatically.
So those who point at the numbers to say it's not genocide have a point, but if deniable genocide is Israel's intent, then all they have to do is continue to withhold food and a lot of Gazans starve to death.
There's certainly food insecurity but it would need to get way worse to make a dent in these numbers; so far it's about 100 reported deaths linked to malnutrition during the conflict.
[1] https://www.savethechildren.net/news/about-130-children-born...
There are really only those two options.
Time will tell. But they’re not that stupid. I don’t think they’re that evil too, but I don’t have to be right about that.