There's a culture of documentation in BSD which exceeds Linux. There's a larger commercial/reputational market for a Linux book of course, but that attracts different writers, who are often not as good/knowledgeable/motivated/dedicated/etc as the BSD documentation writers.
Additionally, BSD has a culture of simplicity and consistency which is entirely absent in Linux. This makes documentation more clear and much more durable.
(I've used both FreeBSD and NetBSD in the past, this is not a baseless claim)
I kid. Sort of. Systemd is a great startup launcher -- maybe even an improvement over rc.d. Although I confess I've never had any issues with rc.d. Systemd can be quicker, which is nice, but 15 seconds saved on a server that reboots very infrequently is not super interesting. More importantly, the rest of systemd is less compelling.
However, the first-party docs are really quite good. Considering that some blog posts are written to compensate for a lack of docs, I wonder if there’s a causal relation there.
I'm joking of course, but that is a bit how I always feel when trying BSD. It reminds me a lot of Linux in the 90s, plus its development appears kind of glacial compared to Linux.