>The skill of these only improve
Citation effing needed. It's taken as an axiom that these systems will keep on improving, even though there's no indication that this is the case.
Citation effing needed. It's taken as an axiom that these systems will keep on improving, even though there's no indication that this is the case.
Please avoid internet tropes and fulmination on HN.
Now, robots can be far more precise than humans, in fact, assisted surgeries are becoming far more common, where robots accept large movements and scale them down to far smaller ones, improving the surgeon’s precision.
My axiom is that there is nothing inherently special about humans that can’t be replicated.
It follows then that something that can bypass our own mechanical limitations and can keep improving will exceed us.
Sure showed me.
Here, some starting material: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_function. Let me know if you'd like me to elaborate, I will when I have some time.
Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer...
Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.