Viral paper on black plastic kitchen utensils earns second correction

> No reviewer can guarantee that there are no mistakes.

Of course not. But I would assume that the goal is to kind of understand the work. If you review my code by saying "it does compile and the name of the variables suggests that it is relevant for the project", that's not enough. You're suppose to get an understanding of it.

I am not saying you should catch every bug, but if I do "int fraction = 3/5" or "val dist_in_meters = dist_in_kilometers * 100", I would expect that you see it. And for an academic paper, there are more than 1 reviewer, right?