No, you're the one speaking about the telescope, while it's not really the point.
Meteorologist have been working there since the 1960s. I'm sure you have some understanding of the conplexity of weather and the precision problems with chaotic systems.
Mauna Loa has been producing quality data since the 60s and has the means (including telescopes) to gather quality data to do quality analysis.
We didn't just strap a telescope to a building - the people in the observatory are not looking at a thermometer, a CO2 meter and then checking out asteroids by the by. Everything they do is to have quality analysis.
The works had been refined over all this time. That's why theres a telescope. Because it's pertinent.
And indeed there are good reasons to do so - many of the observatories were decommissioned starting in 2010 I believe, a long process - care to share anything that would show that's the case here?
To me this is a state of the art meteorological observatory. Unless proven otherwise, we should keep it going.