Why High-Tech Companies Are Moving to the City
online.wsj.com
online.wsj.com
Cities are perfect for attracting the kind of young, interesting, and smart people tech companies want to attract. Also, tech companies are often capable of generating relatively high profit per employee; for these companies, the biggest downside of a city (cost) is not as big of an issue.
I concede that NYC has the best public transportation in the country, but you must have been living in the sticks in California if you think that you can't find "food, culture, and intelligent, diverse population" there.
The only claim to culture that Mountain View or Cupertino has is being within driving distance of San Francisco.
That's true iff you define culture as opera and symphony and certain kinds of museums.
If your definition includes things that one might find in SF's mission district and/or Chinatown, there's culture all over the southbay. For some definitions, Berkeley is the only place in the bay area that "has culture". For others, Oakland is it.
FWIW, there are reasonable definitions of "culture" that can't be satisfied in the US.
PS: Assuming native american cultures are included as part of the US.
To me moving from California to New York for culture makes sense, for a lot of locations in California. Perhaps instead of saying you can't beat New York for culture, I should say I can't beat New York for culture!
That's not what I wrote. I wrote that different folks think that culture means different things, not that those folks have a changing definition of culture.
I get that you like NYC. However, I'll bet that you don't actually take advantage of the culture that you find essential all that often. You're paying for the ability to drop in on a broadway show every day even though you'll likely do it only once every 3-5 years.
I'm glad that you think that you're getting value for your money. How about being respectful of other people's choices wrt their money?
That's true for some people, and for them it's probably not a great idea to pay extra for a theoretical access to things they barely use. On the other hand, when I lived in London I went to see a play 2-3 times a month for the four years I lived there. If I moved back there, the theatre would be major reason why.
I'm absolutely in favor of other people doing what they like with their money - diversity of entertainment choice is a great thing.
For me that meant the city, where the higher density of customers makes it viable for IRL entertainment suppliers to operate further down the long tail of demand. The things I'm interested in are right down that long tail, so I can understand when rm999 found moving to a city has improved his/her quality of life.
For example, if I want hole-in-the-wall Mexican cuisine and I want some Vietnamese dessert, I might be able to walk from one place to the next, in SF. In SJ accomplishing the same would mean going from somewhere in north San Jose, to then somewhere on Senter road. There's no way to walk it (ok, 2 hours). If I want Cambodian it's another trek across the freeways. So, yes, things are there in the SB, but you have to know where to find them and they can be very far from each other. But, if you like "discovery" of hidden places, the SB has some interesting hidden in plain sight places. They're hidden because most have a very targeted (ethnic) audience and few people outside that audience tend to know about those places, unless intro'd by someone who knows.
That is to say, the 'ethnic' aspects of SF actually have a diverse audience in mind, while in SJ, for example, most of the ethnic aspects are directed to a select audience and thus are less approachable by outsiders. At least that's how I felt about these things when I was in SJ.
There is life outside of the 415.
"Can't beat" is an idiom, it means I think those things are pretty awesome in NYC :)
Can't beat means it sets the standard.
I have to say one fun upside to NYC is that theres lots of interesting smart folks (both young and old) doing cool stuff that isn't just "website as a business". The wee coworking space I use is especially fun because I'm surrounded by smart young pros doing high end work in design , architecture, fashion, etc.
Variety is good for the brain, especially when designing numerical algorithms all day :)
“Recruiting and retaining great workers is a big part of it, and downtown is where the development and design community wants to work,” said co-founder and CEO Sam Decker. “Startups don’t want the typical Class A, everything carpeted environment. They love character in their office and a place that feels unique. This is an opportunity to have a place where people look forward to coming to work every day just because of that vibe.”
http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/aust...
Early founder schedules tend to be necessarily isolating. Once you're to the point of having employees and semi-sane work hours, then the rest tends to be personal preference because you can once again coexist with the rest of the world.
The western Canadian telecom Telus is building[1] a new HQ downtown and is moving there from their current building in the Vancouver suburb of Burnaby. The Telus Garden complex will have a residential component as well, and their employees were offered priority and a bit of a deal on units in it. It sold out pretty much instantly.[2]
[1]http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-n... [2]http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/teluss-...
These are interactive media companies.
Many of the latter have emerged as quite innovative in their use and/or creation of emerging software technologies and tools.
For example, I know someone who lives in Bushwick, Brooklyn and pays <600/month (with roommates), and another in a studio for 1200/month. Bushwick is about 30 minutes from Soho by subway.