> you're building intelligence without understanding why it works.
But if we do a good enough job of that, it should then be able to explain to us why it works (after it does some research/science on itself). Yes?
But if we do a good enough job of that, it should then be able to explain to us why it works (after it does some research/science on itself). Yes?
If you're right, and it's essentially impossible to understand (and we still want to advance these technologies) we will have to do so in some degree of ignorance anyway.