Electronics Stores Fight for Survival
online.wsj.com
online.wsj.com
So sad. I can remember when Radio Shack was ... I don't know how else to say this ... a literal radio shack. I was a pre-teenage ham radio operator, and Radio Shack had pretty much everything I needed to build the radio equipment I needed for my ham station.
This was back when people built their own electronic equipment. Yes, I know that's hard to believe in the context of modern times, but when people wanted a radio transmitter or receiver, they would build one.
My first designs were based on vacuum tubes because ... again, I don't know how else to say this ... transistors were just a laboratory curiosity. Later, when Radio Shack started carrying transistors instead of tubes, I began designing transistor circuits.
An early Radio Shack store was a small warehouse of electronic parts, and almost no finished products. Now it's struggling to compete with all the other me-too finished-goods outlets. Even though the name "Radio Shack" sounds like a clever marketing slogan for modern times, originally it was a simple statement of fact -- they were a radio shack. And the employees actually knew something about electronics.
Later I designed electronics for the NASA Space Shuttle, so Radio Shack was part of my unorthodox education. I'll be sorry to seem them go.
Where I see opportunity for Best Buy to differentiate is in customer experience. When the typical consumer decides they want to buy a new laptop, and don't want a mac, they basically have a couple of options. They can either research laptops on their own (through Amazon, Engadget, et al) or they can just drive to a Best Buy store and buy whatever the employee tells them. The thing is, the Best Buy option really isn't much better currently because their average employee isn't very knowledgeable on the laptops they carry.
For this to work, Best Buy would have to both pay employees more and spend more time/money training them. Not to mention the costs associated with re-branding the company as a whole. However, IMHO I think something this drastic needs to be done for them to survive.
Somebody can surely design an high quality expert system for consumer electronics , that asks you some questions and helps you choose good products.
https://www.google.com/search?q=what+hard+drive+will+fit+in+...
Big box stores killed the mom & pops. Online retailers killed the big box stores: Circuit City, Barnes & Noble, Borders, Blockbuster, Tower Records.
WalMart is right to be concerned.
Consumers benefit from online shopping: - Skip the ride to the store and back - Seemingly limitless selection in a few searches - Confidence in pricing by comparing
Brick & mortars need to do their homework and understand the psychology of shopping in an Internet world.
There will always be those who: - Want it right now - Enjoy the social interaction of shopping with friends - Want to talk to someone who knows what they are talking about - Want to be 'seen'
They need to wind down and market to that segment of the population. That is where they are headed anyway.
I think the internet will kill big box stores and bring back mom & pops. There's no point in going to Best Buy/Walmart/etc. to buy something I can get on Amazon for a fraction of the price, but I will browse local stores for unique and interesting goods that are harder to find online if you're not looking for them.
It will bring back browsing as a legitimate activity, something which big box stores completely killed imo.
So infrequently purchased items will be relatively harder to find at physical stores, and need-it-now items will be priced at a high markup in order to pay the rent and labor costs born by physical stores.
Another trend affecting all retail is the recycling of used goods via craigslist, eBay, and so forth. When such an item is purchased used, then its very possible that a retail purchase was lost.
Many people do not need to go to a physical store to learn about desirable goods, rather they observe what their friends have, maybe try it out, then buy online - with no physical store comparison or impulse shopping.
I must admit that I could buy it for cheaper online anyway, but there is currently a negative incentive to go to those shops
Ah, if only. I swear, sometimes it seems like Amazon knocks 10% off MSRP, while Radio Shack adds 10%. And I'm talking sticker, not sales tax.
But, I do believe that convenience of easy ordering (for lazy ppl like me), is bigger differentiator than a couple of percentage points on pricing.
Infrared LED at Radio Shack? They wanted something like $6 per LED. You'll find the same part online for pennies.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_tax1) Store building rent (they ship directly from their warehouses)
2) Cashiers / sales salaries
3) Store security, cameras, loss prevention.
4) Store utilities and other - electricity, water, insurance, heating, cooling, inspections.
5) Liability (such as customers falling or pretending to fall)
6) Inventory tracking, moving things around shelves, optimizing, etc.
Also the convenience that the parent talks about is not what I'd call convenient. Basically the last 4 times I went to a store, they didn't have the thing I wanted, or it was out of stock. And most of the time I want to go to a store, it's not open.
I assume this is at least partially cancelled out by not having to deliver items to stores.