Grounds for Jury Misconduct in Apple v Samsung Patent Trial
macobserver.com
macobserver.com
After some research, and speaking with attorneys, I think there may be a problem with the way the verdict was decided. Not that I'm trying to make a judgment on who should have won, but it seems that this foreman was a bit too excited by his role and the information he claims to possess.
Any thoughts?
That's exactly what this article is saying.
I just imagine a bunch of Apple legal team members watching the foreman's interviews and all of them simultaneously face-palming. It probably won't cost Apple the verdict, but it will cost them more time and money on appeal.