Why climate change alarmism failed
washingtonexaminer.com
washingtonexaminer.com
It's the same as people who hate billionaires instead of hating the parasite class. Lots of overlap but ultimately the incorrect category.
How would you define the parasite class?
Ya know, the people who have designed our entire society to benefit themselves. The people who have turned us into mindless machinery. Those are parasites. They infect our society and make it sick and weak. They take over our collective nervous system to place us in the optimal position for the parasite's benefit.
You're describing billionaires.
CO2 is poison to you, but it's how all plants grow. And we need plants.
I'm disappointed that the article is so poor. It merely rehashes talking points from one side. It doesn't even touch on the core argument made by the other side. The argument made by every climate activist at the end of the day. The n-word. Nuclear. Every argument about climate change always comes back to
>We can't keep using fossil fuels, and renewables aren't enough energy. We need nuclear!
The entire climate change problem was designed with a nuclear solution in mind. And the nuclear solution is a trap. Centralize all energy generation in the hands of a powerful few, and outlaw other forms of energy. No Iran, you cannot have nuclear energy, you must buy it from the few powerful people who get to control it. No John American, you cannot generate your own energy, don't be silly. Now open your wallet and buy nuclear, at whatever price we set.