Hacker News Reader

Comment by BeauNer | Hacker News Reader

18 pointsBeauNer15 comments

I've had conversations with people who didn't even know that the name "Tesla" comes from the prolific inventor, Nikola Tesla who was Edison's competitor as in DC vs AC power.

This is a pointless topic to keep talking about. It just comes down to how you define "founder", and the answer is "it depends". It's uncontroversial that he wasn't there at the very very beginning. It's also uncontroversial that he was involved early and it wasn't doing well until he took control. Outside that it's just a battle of definitions and egos, both of which are very boring.

No. It's factually the case that Musk didn't found Tesla.

There is no semantic argument to make here. The answer is not "it depends". It's not boring to recognize how much Musk lies. He lies freely and routinely.

Trying to minimize and excuse Musk's lies is corrosive and toxic.

There's no shortage of things to criticize him for. This one is a waste of time. A court decision (sorry, settlement, whatever), ruled that he can call himself a founder. He’s not a founder by the strict definition. It doesn’t matter, it’s a waste of energy - and precious brain real estate - to worry about.

> A court decision ruled that he can call himself a founder.

There was no such decision. They reached a settlement. That was part of the deal.

> He’s not a founder by the strict definition.

He's not a founder by the fact of the matter. He can call himself what he likes but it doesn't change history.

> It doesn’t matter

If this bores you don't get involved. But there's no need to try to stop other people talking about it.

I'm a moderator here and my job is to keep the standard of content and discussions high, and this is just not the kind of thing that belongs on HN. It's not new information and it's not the kind of thing that inspires interesting discussions, which is what HN is for.

No cars until Straubel. That's definitely a founder

Elon Musk didn't found Tesla, but he was arguably foundational to its success.

Not sure anyone was under that illusion Tesla Motors CEO Replaced by Elon Musk, Layoffs Expected (2008) (5 points, 5 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=333534

And then Elon Musk buys 1416000 Shares of TESLA Motors (2011) (2 points) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2638859

The Elon fan boys, are always under that impression. Plus the PR machine is always trying to create that impression. Take a look at the wikipedia page for Tesla, there has been an edit war for several years trying to create the impression that Elon created Tesla Motors.

Elon bought the trademark. The "founders" didn't have the right to the name

He merely created 99.9% of it's value

Tesla was founded in 2003 by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning. Elon Musk joined in 2004 as an investor, then became chairman. After a lawsuit in 2009, he was legally granted the title of co-founder, which shifted public perception.

Most people now believe Musk started the company, despite clear documentation showing otherwise. This post breaks down the timeline and how the narrative changed: https://nerds.xyz/2025/07/elon-musk-did-not-found-tesla

Would love to hear how others view the difference between legal co-founder status and historical fact, especially in tech startup culture.

an effective founder imo. it was nothing before he joined. the reason so many people DONT point this fact out is that it ends up being extremely disingenuous to the reasons Tesla was successful.

Interestingly, Elon Musk is also the reason Tesla is no longer successful (experiencing massive drops in sales).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com