If they're in it for the money, instead of the mission, then I say good riddance. That's how we get where we are now.
2-3x staff engineer pay is a LOT of money. More than enough.
2-3x staff engineer pay is a LOT of money. More than enough.
2-3x staff engineer salary is a lot of money. But no matter how much I believed in a mission if I could make 10-20x that and set myself up for life financially I’d have a very hard time turning it down.
I get what you're saying, but I really can't agree. The mission is important in a non-profit. It's part of what makes them work.
Take KDE for example. It's easy to argue they've accomplished MORE than Mozilla has in the last decade.
Their desktop ships with every Steam Deck (along with some niche laptop manufacturers) and they have a vast ecosystem of applications. Albeit some more rapidly developed than others.
Their structure is entirely different than Mozilla so it's hardly a direct comparison. But the main point is that Mozilla's traditional corporate structure seems to be a millstone.
They could have stashed most of their Google funding and kept a solid team of passionate maintainers paid in perpetuity. Goodwill could have volunteers contributing directly to Firefox, instead of forking it.
There's no reason to believe that. But it's still better than someone whose heart isn't in the right place and can't execute.