Web2py 2.0 is out
groups.google.com
groups.google.com
Regarding the "unpythonic" debate: Watching two years of web2py mailing list, it appears that the "OMG, new builtins and globals would confuse everyone!" fear is unjustified - I don't recall a single confusion about it (there might have been one or two I misremember - but there definitely is no room for the FUD)
If you're looking for a Python web framework, I think it is well worth your time to download and play with it a little.
There is nothing to be gained from bashing somebody's hard work which isn't harming you in any way, and is probably benefiting a lot of people. Don't like it? Don't use it. Want to know how it compares to Django/Rails? Do a google search. It has been done sufficient number of times. The reddit thread with Flask's and Django's creator is the most popular I believe.
I preferred what Ian Bicking wrote in response: http://blog.ianbicking.org/unzen-of-unpython.html
One thing I like about the Django community is that part of Djangocon specifically features critics who are invited to criticize Django or some aspect of it, for example:
"Why Django Sucks and how we can fix it" http://blip.tv/djangocon/why-django-sucks-and-how-we-can-fix...
Flasky Goodness (or Why Django Sucks?) http://reinout.vanrees.org/weblog/2012/06/06/flask-django-su...
That's much better and productive than circling the wagons and letting personal insults fly.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/ex54j/seeking_clarif...
You probably won't find it looking for web2py. That was originally a discussion about Pylons/Pyramid that went off into the woods after someone asked "Are web2py and Pylons/Pyramid syntactically and functionally similar?"